cursor
Mar 18, 2025
cursor-ai
A Guide to Setting Up Cursor With CometAPI
The integration of CometAPI with Cursor offers a seamless workflow for developers, improving code suggestions, debugging, and AI-assisted programming. This
May 15, 2025
cursor
grok-3
x-ai
How to Use Grok 3 for Free with Cursor
In the rapidly evolving landscape of AI-assisted development, xAI’s Grok 3 has emerged as a compelling alternative to industry titans, offering cutting-edge
Jun 18, 2025
cursor
Anysphere Launches $200‑a‑Month Cursor AI Coding SubscriptionIs
Anysphere has officially rolled out the Cursor Ultra subscription tier at $200 per month, marking its highest-priced offering to date. Announced on June 17,
Jul 14, 2025
claude-code
cursor
Claude Code vs Cursor: Which is Better (A Comprehensive analysis)
AI coding assistants have rapidly transformed the software development landscapeAmong the leading contenders are Anthropic’s Claude Code and Cursor AI.
Jul 21, 2025
cursor
Cursor AI Pricing: 2025 Complete Guide Analysis to Plans
AI-powered development tools have become indispensable in modern software engineering, and Cursor AI stands out for its versatile coding assistance and model
Oct 30, 2025
cursor
cursor-2-0
Cursor 2.0 and Composer: how a multi-agent rethink surprised AI coding
Cursor, the AI-first code editor and agent platform, released Cursor 2.0 on October 29, 2025 — a major update that pairs a purpose-built coding model (named
Oct 31, 2025
composer
cursor
How Much Does Cursor Composer Cost?
Cursor Composer is a new, frontier-grade coding model released as part of Cursor 2.0 that delivers much faster, agentic code-generation for complex,
Dec 2, 2025
composer
cursor
gpt-5-codex
Composer vs GPT-5-Codex — who wins the coding war?
Two of the highest-profile entrants are Composer, a purpose-built, low-latency coding model introduced by Cursor with its Cursor 2.0 release, and GPT-5-Codex, OpenAI’s agent-optimized variant of GPT-5 tuned for sustained coding workflows. Together they illustrate the new fault lines in developer tooling: speed vs. depth, local workspace awareness vs. generalist reasoning, and “vibe-coding” convenience vs. engineering rigor.
